South Asia Disaster Response
Imagery AnalysisThis is one small part of a huge effort to bring aid and comfort to the hundreds of thousands who have been affected by the recent earthquake and tsunami in South Asia. There are dozens of other parts. Go here (Ground Zero Information) for the main page with current updates and links to dozens of other sites on how you can help. Also go here (SEA-EAT Blog) for updated information on what's happening in South Asia and to find links to volunteers, lost and found people, and much, much more.
This page will be updated
as frequently as possible.
Last Update: Jan 12, 2005, 2235 MST (GMT-7)
SEA-EAT TEAM MEMBERS
Please forward any new links to imagery to the SEA-EAT blog or to Mike.
There is a steady flow of imagery being made available through the UNO Satellite Imagery Agency and through several commercial firms. We are attempting to download and interpret these images as they become available.
Mike Weatherford (primary)
This page is created by volunteers and hosted by a great person who wishes to remain anonymous.
Nancy Bohrer
Feedback is a necessity to increase the usefulness of this page. Please send any comments or ideas here.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|
|
US Geological Survey 10-degree map showing the northern tip of Sumatra and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. This map shows all earthquakes in this area in the last seven days, by intensity. This area is the hardest hit by both aftershocks and the original tsunami. | |
NEEDED
Imagery of the following areas:
- Bangladesh - any
- India - high-resolution of damaged areas
- India - Andaman & Nicobar Islands - high-resolution
- Indonesia - any and all damaged areas, medium & high resolution
- Kenya - any
- Maldives - any non-covered island, especially of the capital Male
- Myanmar - any
- Seychelles - any
- Somalia - any
- Sri Lanka - any
- Tanzania - any
- Thailand - any
Country by Country breakdown of imagery analysis and damage assessments:
Overview
The magnitude 9.0 earthquake that occurred on December 26, 2004, created massive tidal waves that spread out in all directions across the Indian Ocean. The major thrust of the waves was east-west, and minor thrust was north-south. Waves radiating from the epicenter northward and southward did significantly less damage than those moving east-west. The following reports are based on written information, satellite imagery, hand-held imagery, and other sources.The United States Geological survey (USGS) is reporting that the earthquake was caused by a large segment of the India plate being subducted beneath the Burma plate along a thrust fault that stretches more than 1200km (800miles) north-south along the coast of Sumatra and the Andaman and Nicobar islands. The India plate is moving northward at approximately 6cm/year, placing huge stresses on the Burma micro-plate, which includes the island of Sumatra. These stresses were released when approximately 35m of the India plate slid beneath the Burma plate, releasing the energy in the form of a massive earthquake. The Burma plate rose approximately six meters during the earthquake. This violent uplift is what generated the massive tsunamis that spread out east and west at speeds aproaching 550 miles per hour (900km/h). There is no accurate count of the number of primary tsunami waves generated, but several locations report from five to six waves striking shore.
The tsunami waves were approximately 30ft (10m) in height in many locations. The first area struck was the west coast of Sumatra, where waves arrived approximately 20 minutes after the earthquake. The entire northern coastline of Sumatra, from the area around the Banyak Islands to Medan on the east coast, appear to have been seriously affected. Both pre-tsunami and post-tsunami coverage is available for the area from Calang, across the northern coast to the principal city of Banda Aceh, and down the eastern coast to Medan. There is extensive damage to buildings, infrastructure, transportation grids, agriculture and industry throughout the entire area. Banda Aceh is especially hard hit, with approximately one-third of the city totally destroyed, and another 40% damaged or clogged with debris. A number of small towns along the west coast of Sumatra are totally destroyed. Coffee plantations, ricefields, and pastureland has been flooded, stripped of vegetation, or otherwise damaged. A large number of dikes around ricefields have been either damaged or destroyed. Extensive saltwater contamination exists in many areas around the coast. Most areas below 20m (61ft) elevation have experienced some form of damage, and most areas below 10m (30ft) have experienced extensive damage and destruction. The transportation infrastructure along the coast has been heavily damaged, with bridges and roads being wiped out, rail lines damaged, and harbors either wiped out completely or damaged beyond use. An estimated 100,000 Indonesians were killed, and many tens of thousands of others are missing following the tsunami.
A number of towns and resorts on the west coast of Thailand also sustained heavy damage. The island of Phuket suffered extensive damage and loss of life. The area of Khao Lak and villages to the north were also heavily damaged. Surprisingly, elevations of only a few feet protected some areas from the worst of the destruction, while the tsunami waves swept as far as 4km (2.5m) inland around flat areas. There is a lack of adequate high-resolution imagery of the Thai west coast and the coast of Myanmar (Burma) to verify the extent of damage in these areas. Based on the damage to Phuket, one would expect similar damage to exist along the entire west coast of Thailand, much of the coast of Myanmar, and the west coast of Malaysia as far south as the town of Taiping. The southern coast of Myanmar, especially the Irriwaddy delta, is another area where heavy damage is expected.
Due to the physics of the tsunami, Bangladesh and western Myanmar probably suffered less damage than Thailand or the eastern coast of India. Even less damage still probably resulted in many homes destroyed, livelihoods lost, and a death toll approaching (possibly exceeding) 100.
The Andaman and Nicobar Islands, a province of India, were both heavily damaged by the tsunami and the center of more than 100 aftershocks ranging in intensity from about 6.8 to dozens of shocks in the 2.5 - 4.5 range. Several islands suffered heavy damage. The airfield on Cor Nicobar was flooded, but doesn't appear to be damaged. The housing area at the airfield and the town of Malacca suffered extensive damage, and the island ring road was damaged in a number of different places. The port of Malacca suffered moderate damage and heavy silting, and may not be usable by anything but very shallow draft vessels. In the Nicobar Islands, the tsunami caused extensive flooding, and appears to have cut the island of Trinkat completely in half. News reports indicate the stone-age natives of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands may have not suffered greatly, as most live away from the low-lying coastal areas.
India's southeastern coast suffered heavily from the tsunami. A number of towns from Pondicherry down to the village of Agasyampalli sustained moderate to severe damage, with loss of large numbers of buildings, damage to breakwaters and harbors, flooding and erosion. Hardest hit were the towns of Agasyampalli, Karaikal, Tarangambadi, Chennai (Madras) and Nagappattinam. Much of the infrastructure along the east coast was damaged or destroyed, including a number of major bridges, miles of road and rail lines, and several ports. Erosion and flooding have caused significant loss of agricultural land, at least for now.
There has been little imagery of the more heavily damaged areas of Sri Lanka, although a number of news reports have indicated the entire eastern coast and the southern end of the island suffered moderate to severe damage up to two miles (3km) inland in some places. There is a high death toll, due in part to the number of people living in coastal areas, part due to the number of beach resorts filled with European visitors, and part due to no warning and nowhere to go to escape the waves. Much of the island's transportation infrastructure was along the coastal areas, and was damaged beyond use or destroyed.
Other areas that suffered damage include the Maldive Islands, off the southern tip of India, the Seychelles, another group of islands about halfway between the Maldives and Madagascar, and Somalia, Kenya, and Tanzania along the eastern coast of Africa. Among these, the Maldive Islands appear to have been the hardest hit, with over 4000 structures either damaged or destroyed, a number of island beaches heavily damaged, ports and harbors affected, and miles of reef damaged by the tsunami. Also hard hit was Somalia, where over 150 have been killed outright and 15,000 made homeless.
There have been few or no reports of damage to any of the Middle East countries, or any effect of the tsunami wave in the Red Sea or Persian Gulf. Malagasy, the nation that comprises the island of Madagascar, has not reported any damage or deaths. The east coast of Madagascar is relatively steep and underpopulated, so there may not have been any significant damage to report. South Africa has reported a number of deaths and moderate damage. Also missing are substantial reports of damage from Mozambique, also on the east coast of Africa. At least parts of Mozambique may have been shielded by the island of Madagascar.
Major relief efforts are concentrated in the cities of Medan and Banda Aceh in Sumatra, around the island of Phuket in Thailand, along the east coast of India from Chennai to Nagappattinam, and along the central and southern coast of Sri Lanka from Trincomalee to Galle. Additional relief efforts are being carried out from these central locations to other affected areas. The main Phuket international airfield doesn't appear to have suffered any damage (ref. 1 Jan 05 ORBIMAGE satellite coverage), and relief efforts for the rest of the island can be staged from there.
Imagery from Jan 1, 2005, of Diego Garcia and the large US military base in the British Indian Ocean Territories, show no sign of damage or destruction to the major military facilities there, or to the atoll itself.
COUNTRY
- Bangladesh
- British Indian Ocean Territory (Diego Garcia)
- India
- India - Andaman & Nicobar Islands
- Cor Nicobar
- Katchall Island, Nicobar
- North Camorta Is. Nicobar
- Trinkat Is, Nicobar
- Indonesia
- Banda Aceh
- Eastern coast southeast of Banda Aceh
- Western coast southwest of Banda Aceh
- Calang
- Meluaboh
- Kenya
- Maldives
- Myanmar
- Seychelles
- Somalia
- Sri Lanka
- Tanzania
- Thailand
- Khao Lak North
- Phuket
- Phuket International Airport
Bangladesh
No Imagery availableBack to index.
British Indian Ocean Territory (Diego Garcia)
Image Source: Space Imaging, provided through Global Security
Image LinkDiego Garcia
Imagery of Jan 1, 2005, of the airfield, the north complex, and several other locations around the atoll show no sign of damage from the Dec 26, 2004, tsunami.
British Indian Ocean TerritoryAnalysis date: Jan 12, 2005, 1020 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
India
Image Source: UNOSAT, Indian National Remote Sensing Agency
Global Security India page.
NOTE: This page provides links to imagery used in several reports below.Agasyampalli
This area near the southern end of India closest to Sri Lanka shows extensive evidence of tsunami damage. Image quality, however, precludes a detailed analysis. Agasympalli is an area of very flat land, apparent aquaculture and rice fields, and mangrove swamps. There is no protective reef.The "Before" and "After" images from the Indian NRSA show that the area of the town was very heavily damaged by the tsunami. There is an area along the beach for approximately 40m where all vegetation has been stripped bare. The aquaculture and ricefields are heavily damaged, and much of the mangrove swamp on the southeastern coastline is flooded and heavily damaged. Cloud cover precludes determining if the buildup of sediment on the southeastern corner of the area is intact, or has been swept away.
Analysis date: Jan 5, 2005, 1815 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Indian National Remote Sensing Agency, IRS P-6, Dec 28, 2004
ImageChennai City
There doesn't appear to be much damage to Chennai City at first glance, but detailed analysis shows extensive damage to houses and buildings near the ocean, and significant silt deposits in the Andayar River.The small lake at the end of the peninsula above the Andayar river is almost gone on the "After" image, filled with sand and silt. The beachfront area seems to have doubled in width, and all buildings and vegetation about 30m (100ft) inland are gone. Several of the islands in the river are significantly smaller than they were previously, and the amount of silt visible appears to almost block the waterway around and between these islands. There appears to have been a bridge across the Andayar river connecting the noarthern and southern peninsula. Both the bridge and some of the land areas are gone. There is damage to the southern peninsula, and to the coast road shown in the imagery. There is some damage to the road around the crescent of buildings on the inland side of the river, and some damage to the islands further up the river channel, but none of it appears to be substantial. There is flooding in several open areas around the northern portion of the city, indicating that the surge travelled well inland in some areas. This also suggests that there is moderate damage to many buildings that is not visible on this scale imagery.
Analysis date: Jan 4, 2005, 2030 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: Global Security Organization, Space Imaging
Multiple frames. Image date: Dec 29, 2004Chennai (main)
This is very high resolution imager of the city of Chennai, including the harbor. There is moderate damage noted throughout the beachfront areas of the city, and damage to the harbor itself.The breakwater around the harbor has been heavily struck by tsunami waves, but is undamaged. The area inside the harbor shows evidence of some damage, especially along the northern end of the breakwater and the marine railway area. There is significant evidence of erosion, and at least one small building is gone. There is minor to moderate damage to the main wharf, and the entire structure was swept clean of any unsecured items. There are no large vessels in the harbor when this photography was taken, but several small naval vessels are present. There is evidence the local fisihing fleet has sustained moderate damage, with a number of boats on the piers at the south end of the dock, and several others appear to be overturned. There are several boats that were washed ashore at the south end of the harbor.
There appears to be a large container storage area north of the harbor. The outer layers of containers are missing, and several of the other layers show signs of damage. The entire beach area north of the harbor was heavily hit, but the coastal highway appears to be intact, with traffic moving. There is also evidence of light to moderate damage to the houses on the western side of the main coast highway in the northern portion of the city.
South of the harbor, the grassy area below the harbor has been denuded of vegetation. There is evidence of erosion in several places. There are two large warehouses south of the harbor that do not show signs of physical damage, but activity around both indicate that items stored inside may have been soaked by the waves.
Analysis date: Jan 5, 2005, 1715 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Indian National Remote Sensing Agency, IRS P-6, Dec 28, 2004
ImageKaraikal, India
There is evidence of extensive damage all along this portion of the Indian coast, and especially in the vicinity of the Indian towns of Karaikal and Nagapattinam. This photograph shows an area approximately 25 miles (40km) along the coast. Image quality is not sufficient to show damage to specific structures, but there is evidence of damage all along the coast, and extending as much as 2mi (3km) inland, especially around the mouths of the many small rivers in this imagery.Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: Global Security Organization, Space Imaging
Multiple frames. Image Date: Dec 29, 2004Karaikal (Detail)
This very detailed imagery provides the best indication yet of the extent of damage to the area of Karaikal and Nagapattinam.Beginning at the north and working south, the small village on a peninsula to the north of Karaikal has been heavily damaged. Many of the fishing boats belonging to villagers are damaged or missing. The bridge on the main north-south highway across the river is destroyed. The bridge deck is sitting in the riverbed, and both abutments have been washed away. There is extensive flooding and erosion throughout the area. There is a zone of destruction ranging inland from the water's edge approximately 25m (75ft) all along the coast. The bridge into the village appears intact. Many of the beachfront buildings appear to have suffered light to moderate damage.
The town of Karaikal itself appears to have been harder hit. There is more destruction along the beachfront. Many buildings appear to have been destroyed, and a large number have sustained light to moderate damage. There is an area of 20 to 75m from the ocean that is scarred, eroded, and piled with small boats. Debris is visible on some village streets as far as 200 meters from the coast. Some of the minor roads close to the coastline have suffered some damage, but the main north-south highway through the village is intact and undamaged.
The area south of Karaikal is heavily damaged, with evidence of the tsunami surge reaching as far as a kilometer from the coast. The surge wiped out field boundaries, flooded fields,and damaged some minor roads in the area. There is evidence of damage to several isolated buildings, and extensive flooding of pastureland in the area. The coastline itself is heavily eroded, and there are numerous damaged fishing boats visible.
Analysis date: Jan 5, 2005, 1545 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: Global Security Organization, Space Imaging
Multiple frames. Image date: Dec 29, 2004Nagappattinam
This is one of the hardest hit cities on India's east coast. There is extensive damage throughout the coastal portions of the city, and damage up the river valley south of the town center.Beginning in the north of the city, there is moderate to extensive damage to houses along the northern edge of the town, with the greatest damage to buildings closest to the ocean. The rail right of way appears to have been abandoned for some time, but is damaged by wave action in at least two places. there are piles of debris along the eastern side of the railbed over a distance of about 400m. The beach has been well scoured, and numerous buildings damaged. The damage appears to be in pockets about 150m wide and 200m deep, separated by areas of lesser damage 50-300m wide. As in many other cities and villages, areas with trees appear to be less damaged than those without them.
The lighthouse near the mouth of the river harbor is intact, but the buildings around it have suffered moderate damage, and the area has been heavily eroded. The tank farm at the mouth of the river appears undamaged. The two barriers at the mouth of the river on each side have been damaged. The northern barrier has sustained heavy damage near the shore. There is a barge on the wharf near the mouth of the river. There are an estimated 35 boats on the beach south of the river's mouth on the small island there, and at least one additional barge. There are at least three sunken boats in the harbor area of the river. If the rail line to the harbor has not been abandoned, it is unserviceable, being cut in at least three places, and with boats washed on top of the rail line in three places.
There is a concrete breakwater running about 1200m between the river and the Indian Ocean. An area near the north end approximately 30m long has been destroyed. There are several boats along the breakwater that do not appear to be seaworthy. The area at the end of the breakwater where a bridge crosses the river is a chaotic tangle of boats and barges, including at least three boats on the bridge itself. there are pilings for another bridge, but no bridge structure. It is impossible to tell from this imagery whether there is a new bridge under construction or an old bridge being demolished.
South of the harbor and river there is more damage to buildings along the coast. There are two areas of fires, indicating that someone is probably burning debris. One of the fires is in the hardest-hit area of the city, where at least 200 buildings have been damaged or destroyed.
It's apparent from the imagery that the tsunami wave moved up the river for quite a distance. There is damage to areas around the river on both sides for at least 2km upriver. There are a number of damaged buildings and at least 15 sunken boats upriver beyond the bridge. There is extensive flooding of lowlying areas all along the riverbank.
While the majority of the city escaped major damage, the areas around the coast and along the river, as well as the harbor area, have suffered moderate to heavy damage, and will require extensive aid and rebuilding.
Analysis date: Jan 5, 2005, 2215 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: Global Security Organization, Space Imaging
Multiple frames. Image date: Dec 29, 2004Tarangambadi
The northern edge of the town and the area around the mouth of the small river south of town are the two areas that appear hardest hit. Damage ranges from light to severe.In the area north of town, there is heavy ground scarring from the tsunami wave. The houses on the northern edge of town are hardest hit, with approximately 15% destroyed and about 60% damaged. A small drainage ditch is clogged with debris for approximately 30m. Damage to fields and cropland along the northern portion of the town is moderate to heavy. The secondary road leading north from the town is damaged just north of the buildings where the tsunami apparently made its farthest intrusion, approximately 500m inland.
The center portion of the town does not appear to have suffered significant damage, although some internal damage and water damage is expected. There is one small building missing from its foundation. The entire area appears to have been protected by a small bluff. There is a bridge missing across the river, but that appears to be old damage, and not caused by the tsunami wave. There is extensive flooding and moderate damage to croplands along the riverbank and south of the river. Extent of damage cannot be adequately determined due to lack of pre-tsunami coverage.
Analysis date: Jan 5, 2005, 1800 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Andaman & Nicobar Is.
Imagery Source: UNOSAT, Spot imagery, Global Security
Image
Global Security Andaman & Nicobar page.
NOTE: This page provides links to imagery used in several reports below.Cor Nicobar Island
Dec 29, 2004. Overall damage is moderate to severe along the eastern coast on this imagery, except at the south end of the airfield, where an apparent bluff protected the area inland from any damage. Most severe damage appears to be in the area between the airfield and the ocean along the east coast, and in the harbor area of Malacca.
There is still water standing on the northern end of the airfield, but no water is on the runway. The runway is clear and appears to be operational. The main hangar adjacent to the parking apron is intact. The area at the north end of the airfield was hardest hit. There appears to be a housing area consisting of approximately 20 large buildings that have suffered moderate to severe damage. All buildings in the area have been flooded by at least one wave, and internal damage is probably more severe than what appears in this imagery.
The road leading into the housing area appears to have suffered damage. There are several areas that show signs of heavy silt and erosional damage in the housing area and along the coast southward almost to the small peninsula jutting into the ocean on the south. The south end of the runway and what appears to be Approach Control are undamaged. Anything inland of the airfield is also undamaged. The main circular road from the administrative area toward the north is damaged in at least two places. The beach area along the eastern edge of the airfield is heavily damaged.
The coastal area between the Cor Nicobar airfield and the town of Malacca appears to be the heaviest damaged. There is one standing structure just north of the airfield, then a huge expanse of damage reaching up the coast to north of the town harbor. The breakwater on the south side of the port is damaged close to the beach, much of the beach area is heavily eroded, and most structures swept away or destroyed. There is extensive silting of the harbor, and the main portion of the port appear to have subsided or washed away to a depth of approximately five feet (1.6m) from their previous elevation. Imagery quality and digital display are not sufficient to determine if any fishing vessels in the area are seaworthy, but based on damage elsewhere, it's doubtful. The road north of Malacca appars to have washed out north of the port area. The road on the western edge of the airfield is intact around the airfield and to the south, but appears to be damaged just before it enters the town proper.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2004, 1855, MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Indian National Remote Sensing Agency Katchall Island, Nicobar
Remote sensing imagery taken before (Dec 21, 2004) and after (Dec 26, 2004) the December 26, 2004 earthquake and tsunami show the extent of damage to the northern portion of Katchall Island, Nicobar Islands group.The bright red areas depict areas of healthy vegetation. On the second image, the "after" shot, the duller red areas shading to gray black are areas where the tsunami caused extensive damage. The area around the town of Oknange is the hardest hit, suffering the greatest damage. The tsunami wave travelled into the bay there and up the swampy area behind the bay for approximately 6km (4mi). The entire southwestern coast suffered damage, including the villages of Yum Yumkui, Oknange, Oltivile, and Hitlat. There is an area west of Oltivile where floodwaters are pouring out of the valley to the northeast down to the coast. The area along the beach west of Khayat suffered light to moderate damage. The area south of Kapanga along the bay suffered moderate to severe damage. Poor image quality precludes a more detailed evaluation.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2220 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, India National Remote Sensing Agency
ImageNorth Camorta, Nicobar Islands
Before and After false-color infrared imager shows major damage to the coastal areas along the northern half of the island.This is the most obviously-inhabited island seen so far. There are extensive areas of settlement and cultivation. The most heavily-inhabited areas appear to be between Nyjkalang and Tenhaw along the northern coast of the island. The "after" image shows heavy damage around the northern coast, with tsunami damage extending from approximately 200m (310ft) to more than 2km (1.4m) inland. The village of Tenhaw appears to have been on high ground, but damage is extensive all around it. The village of Nyjkalang is on the edge of the damaged area, and may have sustained some damage. Other areas with extensive damage both to the inhabited areas and the environment include Oal Heat, Mahreak, and Kakana. Less damaged areas include the vicinity of Pilpillow and Koihoa.
In addition to extensive damage to the forested and cultivated areas of Camorta, the reef appears to have suffered significant damage in the area along the north coast, and in the area east and south of Kakana. The extent of damage and chances of recovery will require waiting to see if the reef areas flush themselves of the excessive sediment washed from the island.
Analysis date: Jan 3, 2005, 1710 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Indian National Remote Sensing Agency, IRS P-6, Dec 26, 2004
ImageTrinkat, Nicobar Is.
Trinkat is one of the hardest hit of the Nicobar islands. Imagery taken immediately after the tsunami struck shows the island bisected, and almost half of its land area under water. The villages of Ol Ok Chuaka and Tapiyang have all but ceased to exist, and the village of Kopilla is more than 70% destroyed. The mangrove swamp on the northern end of the island has lost approximately 35% of its trees. There is extensive silting and erosion, indicating damage to the coral reef around the island. There is also considerable damage to the area around Takasem, and around the village of Bada Ina on the southeastern coast of Camorta island.Image quality is not sufficient to determine damage to structures or infrastructure on the island.
Analysis date: Jan 4, 2005, 2115 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Indonesia
Reference Image of Northern Sumatra
Source Imagery: DigitalGlobe
ImageryBanda Aceh, Indonesia
Original imagery data was manipulated using LView Pro to provide best contrast/exposure for interpretation.The city of Banda Aceh is one of the worst-hit areas in Sumatra. Approximately 70% of the city appears to be damaged or destroyed.
The first pair of images show the heavily-built-up northern island. All the buildings on the northern island were destroyed. Approximately 40% of the island is under water or washed away. The major docking basin at the east end of the island is 60% destroyed. The highway bridge to the island at its western end is intact, but the pedestrian bridge about a half-kilometer to the east is destroyed. Large portions of the island are under water in this imagery. All fish farms have been destroyed. Most of the docking facilities for the fishing fleet are gone. Any houseboats in the inner harbor are either destroyed or sunk.
The area of the city inland from the island is also badly damaged, although an occasional structure remains standing. These structures are probably heavily damaged on the inside, and will have to be rebuilt from ground up to be safe for occupation. About 70% of the roads in the area are either under water, badly damaged, or blocked by debris. The only human activity noted on the first "after" image are a few people in the streets. No vehicles of any kind are present.
The second set of images are close-ups of the damage on the north island. You can see that there is practically nothing left on the island, and nothing undamaged. Several large structures are gone completely, and others are only represented by foundations and a few vertical walls. In one area on the south side of the island where there had been some 70 floating houses there is now only muddy water and a few sunken walkways. Even the water vegetation is gone. Several dozen wharves and piers where fishing boats were at anchor in the June imagery are totally gone. All that remain of any boats in the December photograph are a few hulls partially submerged, or the remains of boats scattered on semi-dry land. All roads are damaged, covered with rubble, or under water.
The third set of photos show damage further inland. The fields (probably rice, some fish farming) are totally flooded, and most of the dikes between them are either under water or damaged. The crops for this year are totally devastated. The amount of standing water will cause problems of mosquitos and other water-borne disease vectors. The amount of devastation will mean that clean-up and recovery will require considerable time and resources.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, IKONOS, DLR, Dec 29, 2004
UNOSAT ImageryBanda Aceh area - East Coast.
This is Subset 2 on the map accompanying the photography. Subset 2 is located near the town of Idi, about 90 miles (145km) east-southeast of Banda Aceh on the east coast of Sumatra.This is the second in a set of four "before and after" shots from DLR, the German Remote Sensing Group, show the extent of damage that has occurred along the eastern coast of Sumatra south of Banda Aceh. The damage on the east coast is not quite as severe as the west coast, but is still considerable. Most of the rice fields in the area are flooded, and many of the dikes between fields have been damaged. The village located at the top of the photo is virtually wiped out. Many of the rice fields will require extensive effort to remove debris before any crops can be planted. Most of the roads and bridges are severely damaged or clogged with debris. Fields were stripped bare, and may be contaminated with salt and debris.
The village in the lower right corner of the image has not been as extensively damaged, but even those houses that are still standing have probably suffered moderate damage, and most areas are clogged with debris. One of the three buildings in the lower center of the photograph has 2/3 of the roof removed. The large group of buildings in the center of the "before" image has suffered about 85% destruction, and the remaining buildings are obviously damaged.
It is apparent the tsunami wave struck from north to south in this image. The degree of damage is most severe in the areas shown on the northern portion of the image, then gradually lessens as one moves south. There is still moderate damage even in the southernmost areas shown on the photography. Approximately 95% of all structures are destroyed in the area shown on the upper half of the image, and approximately 80% of the structures on the southern half of the image are destroyed. At least 75%, and possibly as much as 100% of the structures not destroyed are damaged. Approximately 90% of the trees shown on the "before" shot are missing on the "After" image. The road leading north from the village in the lower-right corner of the images appears to be intact, but will require checking to determine if the several bridges in the area are capable of supporting normal weights.
UPDATE: Additional imagery from DigitalGlobe reveals the extent of the damage to the city center, and the difficulty of cleaning up the area. The new photos show both the extent of the damage and the amount of debris that will have to be removed before the area can begin to recover. The main mosque is visible on one image. There is less debris there than in many places, but some exists, and there is mud throughout the compound. An athletic field and park possibly associated with an Indonesian Army unit in the city is covered in mud several inches, possibly even feet, deep. Many of the streets are filled to the second story with debris. All bridges in the city center appear to be intact, but on-site inspection will be required before submitting any bridge to heavy weights. Even in this area that escaped the brunt of the impact, there are many damaged or destroyed buildings, especially those to the north.
Additional imagery of the area west of Banda Aceh also shows heavy damage to lowlying areas. This photography also shows how higher hills can channel the destructive force of the tsunami, and increase the distance the damage extends inshore. This area has been heavily hit. Several small villages have been wiped out. Most fields, both water-irrigated and dry land, have been severely damaged. There is extensive evidence of beachfront erosion, with as much as 400ft (120M) of beachfront simply gone. There are at least two missing bridges in the imagery, and heavy damage to a number of roads.
Analysis date: Jan 4, 2005, 1455 MST (G-7)
Updated Jan 7, 2005, at 1820 MST (G-7).
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, IKONOS, DLR, Dec 29, 2004
UNOSAT DLR Image
UNOSAT DLR Image
Banda Aceh area - West Coast
This analysis covers Subset 3 and Subset 4 on the map accompanying the photography. Subset 3 is located just south of Banda Aceh, and Subset 4 covers the area between subset 3 and Calang. The area covered shows about 50 miles (80km) of coastline.The destruction from the tsunami was considerably greater on the west coast than on the east coast of Sumatra, as it was closest to the epicenter of the earthquake that spawned it. The area covered by these two images is fairly densely populated, with both a number of medium-sized settlements and numerous individual dwellings. The entire area was heavily used for agriculture and some animal husbandry. There were numerous orchards in several places throughout the area.
Extensive damage is visible on Subset 3 imagery. Almost all vegetation in the area covered by this subset has been removed. All agricultural areas were denuded, and are probably contaminated with debris and salt. There are very few trees standing anywhere in the area. Approximately 90% of all buildings have been destroyed. Remaining buildings are probably heavily damaged, and should be considered contaminated. The beachline throughout the entire area is heavily eroded. There does not appear to be much drainage at the time this imagery was taken, and there is little silt being deposited in the ocean. The north-south highway in the center of the photos is damaged, and at least one bridge appears to be down. All secondary roads are in extremely poor shape due to erosion or are blocked by debris. There are several areas with extensive flooding and standing water.
There is less damage to vegetation on Subset 4 imagery, but the damage to manmade structures is still quite extensive. The rail line that runs along the coast is damaged or destroyed in no fewer than 11 places. The entire railbed is gone in several places. An object that appears to be a large barge is on top of the rail line near the top of the imagery. There is a small oil refinery or gas separation plant that hs sustained considerable damage, although at least one of the two spherical tanks appears to be intact and there is little or no leaking anywhere in the compound. The wharf in the harbor west of the refinery has suffered heavy damage, and there appears to be an overturned vessel in the harbor. Most buildings along the coast have been totally destroyed. There is severe to moderate erosion all along the coastline, but the area is not as devastated as the area to the north.
Analysis date: Jan 4, 2005, 1730 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, USGS EROS multispectral imaging system UNOSAT Image Calang, Sumatra
The two EROS images show the extent of destruction along the west coast of Sumatra around the town of Calang, located approximately 60mi (100km) south of Banda Aceh. The yellow lines on both images show the maximum extent of the heavily damaged area.In the first image, the bright-green area is healthy vegetation. The dull pink to red areas indicate human habitation or cleared areas. Blue/blueblack is water.
In the second image, the dull red areas shading to purple are areas damaged by the tsunami. As you can see, the damage is pretty severe throughout the main inhabited areas, with damage being virtually total from the coastline to approximately 2km (1.3mi) inland. In some areas, the area of primary damage extends as far as 5km (3mi) inland, especially along the slow, sluggish rivers of the area. The town of Calang is virtually destroyed, as are most human habitations along the bay area and inland along the river. The tsunami reached to the edge of the village of Cutek. Receding seawater left many areas close to the coast flooded. The villages of Kuede Panga and Kuedo Teunom were also heavily damaged. Scale of imagery precludes a more detailed evaluation, but the force of the tsunami would suggest that most roads in the area are impassable, and that all bridges are either washed away or badly damaged.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Imagery Source: DigitalGlobe QuickBird image. Meluaboh
This city of at least 50,000 has been severely damaged all along the coastal areas of the city, and for six to eight blocks inward. Although the damage is extensive, there are a number of buildings and infrastructure standing, and on this date - Jan 7, 2005 - traffic and people are moving within the city.The city of Meluaboh can be roughly divided into thirds by three main thoroughfares that meet at a circle in the center of the city. These three areas are labelled "west beach", "eastern quarter", and "southern town" for convenience. The "west beach" area also includes the peninsula that juts into the Indian Ocean.
The West Beach area is almost totally destroyed, with only a dozen or so prominent buildings surviving. A third or more of the palms that lined the beach in this area are gone. Almost all housing is destroyed or significantly damaged. The main north-south road is completely covered with sand as it approaches the coast on the northern side of the city. Many of the major streets in the city itself have been cleared of debris, and there is vehicle and pedestrian traffic in a number of places within the city. The beach along the western coast has been severely eroded, and there are a number of areas of flooding throughout the area. Smaller streets within this part of the city are still clogged with debris. Many of the buildings near the center of the city remain standing, however many of these have probably been damaged by water and debris. Even in the town center there are some buildings that have lost roofs and suffered damage.
The damage to the buildings along the peninsula range from total to moderate. The lighthouse at the end of the peninsula remains standing, but its operational status is unknown. The radio tower closer to the town center also remains standing, and the buildings on both sides of it appear to have suffered light to moderate damage. There are a few buildings along the area that also appear to have not been totally destroyed.
The small harbor on the river on the south side of town has suffered moderate to severe damage, although some boats remain in fairly good condition. The breakwater along the southern shore has been breached in at least three places, and the island heavily eroded behind it. There are a number of boats washed up on the mainland side of the harbor, and at least one boat on its side in the river. At least 90% of the buildings on the island have been destroyed. Along the area south of the breakwater the tsunami wave pushed at least a half-mile inland, destroying approximately half the structures in that area, damaging another large percentage, and leaving flooding in many areas. Debris, including fishing boats up to 35 feet in length, was pushed as far inland as the back of buildings along the main east-west thoroughfare in the city. Several of the streets appear to have been cleared of debris, indicating that some city functions are operating, and people are beginning to rebuild their lives.
The east side of town suffered the least damage, being farthest from the sea. However, some areas to the north show significant patches of damage, with from 40% to 70% of the buildings destroyed and the streets blocked by debris.
Analysis date: Jan 12, 2005, 1250 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Kenya
No Imagery available.Back to index.
Maldives
Maldives Disaster Management Page.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Spot-5
UNOSAT Spot ImageDhigafinolhu, Maldives
Image quality is very poor. There does not appear to be much in the way of structural damage on the small island to the north (at the upper right corner of the photo), which is the most built-up of the islands in this imagery. There does not appear to be any damage on the small island due south of there. There is a third island to the west that appears to have minor habitation. Most of the built-up areas are on the western coast of the island, and do not appear damaged. A fourth island at the lower right side of the photograph appears to have suffered some damage, but the extent cannot be determined from this image.There is extensive reef scarring all along the eastern edge of the reef in this imagery. Some of the scarring extends inward as far as 500m (1600ft) from the eastern edge of the reef. There does not appear to be much erosion or silting of the coastal waters.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Spot-5, Dec 30, 2004
UNOSAT Spot imageGulhi, Maldives
Image quality is not sufficient to provide an in-depth analysis. Reef scarring near the inhabited island of Gulhi indicates that there is an excellent chance of structural damage to buildings on the island. However, no serious damage occurred to either of the two harbors or to the infrastructure of the island. Boats can be seen in several places within the lagoon, indicating that some normal activity is taking place. There is some indication of silting along the northern and eastern coast of the island, but the activity is minor compared to other areas.Analysis date: Jan 3, 2005, 2010 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, Spot, Dec 30, 2004
UNOSAT Spot imageGuralahu
Image rectified for enhanced interpretability.Damage to Guralahu appears to be light to moderate. The two harbors in the photography appear to be operational. There does not appear to be significant damage to the reef surrounding the islands, or to the islands themselves. The islands do not show any of the severe ecological damage that is apparent in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, although some reef damage is apparent. Image quality is insufficient to determine damage to individual dwellings.
Analysis date: Jan 3, 2005, 1640 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Imagery Source: UNOSAT, SPOT-5, 30 Dec 04
UNOSAT Spot ImageMafushi Island, Maldives
This island shows signs of moderate to severe damage. The damage can only be implied, as the imagery is not of sufficient resolution for precise interpretation.There is evidenceof damage to housing at the north end of the island, where the absence of house roofs indicate the houses are no longer standing. There is evidence of access drives and foundations, but the basic structural details are missing. The damaged area appears to extend approximately 50m (160ft) from the coast. Indirect evidence indicates at least 20 structures were destroyed, and the possibility that as many as 50 more are damaged. The majority of the roads on the island appear intact, but several along the coast at the north end of the island appear damaged. There is also an indication at the south end of the island that the city's main port has sustained some damage, and the wharf there has sustained at least moderate damage. All the apparent damage is on the eastern side of the island. There is no visible damage to structures or infrastructure on the western side of the island.
The reef area appears intact, and damage can be considered minor to moderate all along the eastern barrier reef. There is some evidence of outwash along the northern end of the island and just below there opposite two of the island's probably-unpaved roads.
Analysis date: Jan 3, 2005, 1822 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: Global Security, via Space Imaging Male International Airport
The Dec 27, 2005 image is degraded by moderate cloud cover, but enough can be seen to know that the island and airfield have suffered some damage from the tsunami. There are a number of places on the main runway where debris is, or has been until recently. The runway itself appears to be pitted in several places. Several smaller buildings around the airfield and at least one parking apron have been damaged, and a number of buildings on the west side of the airfield were destroyed. The main terminal area is cloud covered. The harbor near the airfield has sustained moderate to severe damage, with a number of the floating piers suffering some damage. The fuel storage area appears to have not been damaged, and there doesn't appear to be any fuel leakage. The harbor on the west side of the airfield also appears to have suffered damage, and a number of boats have been washed ashore. There is moderate damage to the reef surrounding the eastern and southern ends of the airfield.
Hulule Is., MaldivesAnalysis date: Jan 12, 1315, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Myanmar (Burma)
No imagery available.Back to index.
Seychelles
No imagery available.Back to index.
Somalia
No imagery available.Back to index.
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka (DigitalGlobe image)
Analysis from a natural color, 60-centimeter (2-foot) high-resolution QuickBird satellite image featuring the town of Kalutara, on the southwestern coast of Sri Lanka. Imagery was collected at 10:20 a.m. local time, slightly less than four hours after the 6:28 a.m. (local Sri Lanka time) earthquake and shortly after the moment of tsunami impact.
Kalutara. Area located approximately 50km south of Colombo. This image was taken shortly after the tsunami struck. Note the secondary tsunami waves sweeping from south to north. The main wave and succeeding waves broke around the southern tip of Sri Lanka and travelled north parallel to the coast. Wave height for the first wave (near the top) is approximately 20 feet (7m). wave height of the second wave, just below center, is approximately 15 feet (5m). The village shown was hard hit for approximately 100m (320 feet) inland. The beach and first row of houses are very heavily damaged. The first row of houses on the right side of the northwest-southeast highway are also heavily damaged. There is a line visible about halfway through the area between the first and second major roads, indicating the maximum distance travelled by the breaking wave (note color change, especially of trees). Wave surge probably continued beyond the break-line to the second major highway.There is damage to the coastal highway at several locations, caused by water draining back into the ocean following the surge. Exact extent of damage is difficult to determine at this time, as water from the wave is still fairly deep. There is a secondary tsunami wave (the half-circle near the top of the image), and another near the lower-middle portion of the image. Both waves are travelling northwest parallel to the coast, instead of breaking from the ocean directly onto the coast. Such waves usually do not cause extensive damage very far inland. Note that the top of the secondary wave at the top of the photo is higher than the trees along the beach road. Trees around the houses seem to break the force of the wave. Houses in heavily-treed areas are not as completely destroyed or damaged as houses in open areas. There is a larger-than-average building just right and below the center of the photograph which appears to have suffered only minor damage and flooding. This would probably be a good distribution point for emergency relief. The road on the right side of the image appears to be undamaged in this segment. The quality of the imagery and the lack of stereoscopic coverage makes it difficult to estimate degree of damage, but it appears that approximately 90 houses were severely damaged or destroyed, and approximately 170 have sustained some damage.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2004, 1555, MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: ORBIMAGE, via Global Security Trincomalee, Sri Lanka
At first glance there is little indication of damage or destruction on the imagery of the Trincomalee area. Closer examination however shows beach erosion, a number of structures damaged or destroyed, and several areas flooded, including at least a dozen buildings and several fields. The area covered is less than two square miles, and shows only a tiny portion of the city.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Tanzania
No imagery available.Back to index.
Thailand
Imagery Source: UNOSAT, IKONOS, DLR, Dec 29, 2004
UNOSAT DLR ImageKhao Lak North
There are significant areas of damage on these photographs. There are also areas which appear to have suffered minor to moderate damage, and some areas which were sufficiently high enough that no damage occurred. The blue line on the photographs represent the pre-tsunami coastline. The red lines outline the area which was subject to the tsunami, and where damage of some degree occurred. This evaluation will attempt to use recognizable landmarks for reference points.The area around Laem Pakarang suffered moderate to severe damage. The majority of the buildings on the small peninsula on which the town sits were destroyed, although several appear to still be standing. Below the town there is a row of houses which appear to be relatively intact, although some internal damage is highly probable. The orchards in the area east of the town appear to be from 50% to 90% intact, although some salt water contamination is probable. Eight of the fish ponds south of town appear to be in good condition. Another six ponds appear to have suffered moderate to severe damage, and appear to either be empty or filled with silt. There appears to have been a resort area south of the fish ponds on the banks of a small stream. the area has suffered extensive erosion, there is only one of the six buildings on the north bank of the stream still standing, and about half of the houses in the housing area south of the stream are gone. There is a row of houses between the village of Laem Pakarang and the resort that appear to be intact, and the trees between the houses and the shoreline remain standing. This is a good indication that damage to those houses was not substantial.
There is an area of extensive damage running from the coastline about a kilometer (.6mi) to 1.5 km (1.1mi) inland. The majority of all surface vegetation and all human structures were either damaged or destroyed, including the road network. Several fish ponds have been damaged or filled with silt and debris. There are extensive areas of standing water which are probably contaminated with salt and debris. There is a compound west of the village of Khuk Khak that appears to be a park or some type of religious compound (burial ground?). It is 80% destroyed, and all the ponds surrounding the few buildings either filled with silt and debris or destroyed. Almost all the trees in the compound are gone. The area south of the compound is also heavily damaged, with many destroyed trees and buildings. The village of Khuk Khak itself seems to have sustained only moderate damage, and many of the buildings in the town remain standing. Imagery quality does not permit evaluation of the extent of moderate damage.
While there has been severe erosion of the coastline and moderate to severe damage in many areas, the Laem Pakarang area has not been as devastated as some areas around Banda Aceh, and will be easier to restore to normal. The main road and many of the secondary roads appear to be usable, if not intact. The most severe damage appears to be the loss of the village of Laem Pakarang, the damage to two resorts in the area, and environmental damage to croplands, fish farms, orchards, and pastures.
Analysis date: Jan 4, 2005, 1825 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Image Source: UNOSAT, USGS Landsat imagery
UNOSAT Landsat imagePhuket
This "Before" imagery has been updated by shading the area which was susceptible to damage from the Dec 26, 2004, tsunami. The shaded areas include all areas below 20m (60ft) in elevation. The tsunami was estimated at 10m (30ft) in height, but surge could push the water as high as 40m (125ft) above mean sea level. This information will be updated with actual damage imagery when it becomes available.UPDATE: Several frames of imagery of Phuket Island are available from Global Security. Two of the frames show the bay north of the city of Phuket and the area inland from there. There is no damage visible on these images. The majority of damage apparently occurred in Patong Bay on the west side of the island, and in the area south of Patong Bay. Analysis date: Jan 12, 2005, 2235 MSG (G-7)
Analysis date: Jan 3, 2005, 1725 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Imagery Source: Space Imaging via Global Security. Multiple images dated Jan 1, 2005. Phuket International Airport
Neither the airport nor the area surrounding it appear to have been badly damaged during the Dec 26, 2004 tsunami. There is some evidence of erosion and modest ground scarring along the beachfront, but there is no damage to the airfield or its facilities. Two C-130 aircraft are on the main parking apron, and there appears to be two large stacks of emergency relief supplies nearby. There are several commercial aircraft at the terminal and at another parking apron on the other side of the airfield. There does not appear to be much action at the time this image was taken.There is a golf course and at least two resorts nearby, all undamaged. There does not appear to be any damage to infrastructure on this image, or on imagery of the center of the island.
Analysis date: Jan 12, 2005, 2215 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Analysis date: Jan 2, 2005, 2135 MST (G-7)
Back to index.
Imagery Sources
The following companies and/or government agencies have provided access to satellite imagery on the Internet. The provided imagery has been used exclusively for these reports. Raw, unprocessed imagery is available at these sites:DigitalGlobeUNOSAT
UNOSAT is the United Nations organization that acquires satellite images from multiple sources and provides it free of charge for those using it to support United Nations-sponsored programs, including disaster relief.Global Security
Global Security has a number of pages providing both "before" and "after" images of many areas hardest hit by the tsunami.Global Security's Tsunami imagery main page
India's National Remote Sensing Agency
Rapid Mapping Service (French) Tsunami page
Special thanks to CityStar Group for providing one of the two sites hosting this page. Another special thanks to the anonymous donor of 500mb of webspace for this site and the images used.